Brent oil is currently on a bullish trend, facing resistance near $84 and supported by the 200-day EMA. Breaking above this level could lead to a climb towards $90. Short-term support is observed around $80, backed by the 50-day EMA. As summer approaches and travel increases, crude oil tends to benefit from seasonal patterns. Despite temporary setbacks, buying...
TRUMP, ELECTION, USD: Cleveland debate
2020-10-01 • Updated
A messy intro
So there was a pre-election debate between the US President Donald Trump and the former US Vice-president Joe Biden in Cleveland last Wednesday. It lasted 1.5 hours… and it was hard. Hard to understand, hard to sort out who said what, hard to match the facts with the words, hard to leave aside the lies and the allegations of lies – and hard to see what’s going to happen with the USD if either of the candidates wins. But still, let’s try.
As orators, Donald Trump was definitely on the offensive, and Joe Biden was keeping defense throughout the conversation. From a humane point of view, of the “word-to-fact ratio” was equal between the two (which one can hardly verify), an impartial observes is probably more likely to favor Donald Trump. Just because he appears more comfortable in the debate – you just see it. He does interrupt, he does play it “dirty”, and that exactly creates an impression that he feels comfortable to go beyond the format of the public discussion. Joe Biden couldn’t pick up with the pace most of the time and partly due to this was looking definitely less aggressive in general. That’s why he looked more like an offended side that is trying to restore some kind of balance and advocating certain ideals of social purity and fairness. For that reason, it felt like Joe Biden was addressing and appealing to those in the American society who feels abused, mistreated, offended, belittled, forgotten, etc. That’s why, and Donald Trump didn’t hesitate to use that stigma, Joe Biden was coming as a far-leftist, socialist-like candidate who was going populist in this line (socialist populism presses on “defending the offended” most of the time – and wins hearts with that). In the meantime, Donald Trump was trying to portray himself as a centrist, support by power structures, a strong businessman in the highest rank of power who knows how to sort things out... and how to talk himself out of problems as well. Joe Biden was accusing his opponent of that most of the time: his central argument against Trump was that a lot of words were said, and very few actions really took place.
Source: Bloomberg (very often during the debate, the only thing that was left to Biden while his opponent was going all-out on him, was smiling)
Trump’s argument against Biden in economic talks was that what Biden suggests is unrealistic and unfeasible most of the time. Everything from what is related to climate change to taxes and “making America great again”. Biden’s argument is that Trump only defends big businesses and never thinks of the fundamentals of any economy – small businesses. Hence, the different views on tax policy: Biden wants to increase the corporate tax, Trump doesn’t. Speaking in Marxist ideology (which none of the speakers would probably like), Biden suggests the way to redistribute social wealth in favor of the lowest classes, while Trump relies on the corporate tycoons. What was apparent, though, is that Trump’s thinking is more economic-like, in general. Biden’s is more ideological and politics-based. You know it when you see it: if a person has a “business grip”, you feel it. Trump has it. Biden – hardly. But who knows. Anyway, the first impression that comes to one’s mind is that Trump is more “familiar” with the USD just because he is a businessman in the first place: he knows how to make money, he knows what can be done with the money, he knows tax code like a local church pastor knows Testament. So wherever the USD goes with Trump, it appears that Trump will just be more comfortable driving it in either direction. Whereas with Joe Biden, the USD will always be an economic consequence of political actions. Furthermore, even when Joe Biden says that Trump has no plan for basically anything, somehow it feels like if a Trump, who supports big businesses, is in power, there will be more dollars in circulation. In the end, one of his stances was that America has long been waiting to see cheap US dollar to compete with other – particularly, Chinese – cheap national currencies. That would attract foreign investment to the US and expand the American economy. Otherwise, international businesses would leave to other countries, such as China, Mexico, or even Russia – that’s another argument Trump has against Biden. So in general, Trump appears “more economic” and more about the USD than Biden. Biden appears more about “the abused” which, taken technically, is no less populist than Trump’s making America great again, etc.
Source: Bloomberg (this time, Trump went really personal on Biden, and Biden was visibly pushed out of his normal balance)
No man’s land
One of the primary issues that loom on the horizon for the USD is actually not who wins the election, but whether he (we can say only “he” now as both candidates are male – Americans chose it so) will be accepted as the winner. As Nouriel Roubini rightly stated, the schism in the American society, the intensity of the polemics, the rise of urban crime, and lack of control of situation over Covid-19 – even with Trump’s law enforcement measures – all point to a serious possibility of a prolonged effect of the elections process on the USD as an indicator of the American domestic well-being. In other words, the USD will definitely have prolonged pressures if there is a chance that the voting before, on, and after the planned day of election sees any kind of impediment for being carried out on time and – very importantly – recognized. Not only the USD, of course, - the stock market will have a big downside potential if either candidate with his supporters disagrees with the outcome of the election. And that possibility seems to be gaining momentum. That’s why, while we don’t know where the USD goes with either candidate, expect higher volatility and unpredictability within the next five weeks.
Bearish Scenario: Sales below 78.99 with TP1: 77.93, TP2: 77.45, and upon its breakout TP3: 76.56 and TP4: 75.70 Bullish Scenario: Purchases above 78.00 (wait for a pullback to this area) with TP1: 1679.00 (uncovered POC*), TP2: 79.33, and TP3: 79.66 intraday
Bearish Scenario: Sales below 80.00 with TP1: 79.34, TP2: 78.94, TP3: 78.55, and 78.00 Bullish Scenario: Buys above 78.00 (wait for a retracement to the zone) with TP: 79.34 TP2: 80.00, and TP3: 81.00
On Friday, the gold price (XAUUSD) retreated from a recent two-week high, facing selling pressure. This decline was driven by hawkish minutes from the FOMC meeting, indicating the Fed's reluctance to cut interest rates. Elevated US Treasury bond yields, supported by a "higher-for-longer" narrative, further weakened demand for gold...
Bearish Scenario: Selling below 22.65 with TP1: 22.34 (intraday) and TP2: 22.02 (swing). Bullish Scenario: Buying above 22.70 with TP1: 22.90.
Intraday and swing scenarios based on price action and volume profile.